February 14th, 2012
thebriefingroom

EU nations commit to cutting PSE expenditures

Nearly every European Union country has committed to reducing their expenditures on universities, reports Times Higher Education. Spain is cutting €485 million from education overall, and assistance to local authorities — key supporters of universities — will be reduced by just over €1 billion. Ireland’s budget in December included a 2% reduction in core funding for PSE to secure savings of €23.6 million. In Italy, high-profiled budget cuts offer little hope for PSE investment in the country in 2012. With a 20% fall in PSE funding predicted by 2013 even before December’s “Save Italy” budget cuts of €30 billion, most expect more pain to follow. Since the European Universities Association’s most recent report in June, only Norway, Finland, and Germany have maintained their commitments to increase funding for PSE. France remains committed to plans to invest up to €30 billion to improve universities and research through its national loan system, but borrowing billions could be tricky in light of its own lingering debt problems. Times Higher Education (Academicagroup)

February 2nd, 2012
thebriefingroom

Education is a public good

Hundreds of students across the province came together on February 1st for the Canadian Federation of Students’ Day of Action to protest Nova Scotia’s continuing erosion of funding for higher education.  The average Nova Scotian graduate leaves university with $30,000 in accumulated debt, a number that will continue to rise with recently-announced cuts.  Tuition for some programs in the province will go up by as much as 3% next year.

Laura Penny, professor and author of multiple books, including “More Money Than Brains: Why School Sucks, College is Crap, and Idiots Think They’re Right,” spoke to the crowd of hundreds.  See Penny speak at the 4th Annual CCPA-NS Fundraiser in October 2011, here.

In April 2011, CCPA-NS released a study entitled, “Fairness, Funding and our Collective Future: A Way Forward for Post-secondary Education in Nova Scotia.”  The authors call on the government to stop underestimating both the individual cost of pursuing a post-secondary education as well as the benefits to society as a whole.  Read their recommendations, here.

January 30th, 2012
thebriefingroom

uSask study examines accessibility of university education

Irrespective of their income status, parents who lack a higher education are not likely to see their children pursue post-secondary studies, observes a University of Saskatchewan report that examined the accessibility of a university education in Canada and Saskatchewan. Much of the conversation about PSE accessibility has focused on tuition rates and other costs, but the report notes that non-financial barriers are key to understanding why some youth choose not to pursue PSE. Despite continuing increases in tuition and other education-related expenses, the overall cost incurred by the average student remains relatively unchanged as a result of increased tax credits, scholarships, bursaries, and other government initiatives, states the report. The study notes that while the financial-aid system is an important aspect of accessibility, there must be a focus on the 10- to 15-year-olds who demonstrate an academic aptitude and who do not come from a culture of PSE. uSask News Release | Accessibility and Affordability Report 2011 (Academicagroup)

January 26th, 2012
thebriefingroom

Break down financial barriers to higher education

For many grade 12 students, spring is university application season. In Western Canada, youth living in families with an annual income over $100,000 are still more than twice as likely to attend university than youth with family income under $25,000.

This is hardly surprising, given average tuition fees run over $4,800 a year these days, but it’s fundamentally inequitable. It undermines social cohesion and there are real economic costs to all of us when we don’t fully utilize the skills and capabilities of all our citizens.

Reducing upfront costs for students would improve access to higher education and ensure that B.C. can reap the benefits of a well-educated work-force. And it’s more affordable than you think.

Conventional wisdom has it that higher education in B.C. is heavily subsidized because tuition fees don’t cover the full cost of education. But this common misconception ignores a second way in which students pay for their education: through higher taxes after graduation.

When these tax payments are added up over the course of graduates’ careers, it turns out that university students fully repay the cost of their degrees and then some.

Despite the pervasive stereotype of arts majors serving lattes at Starbucks, the reality is that higher education remains a great investment in today’s economy. University graduates experience shorter periods of unemployment, are more likely to work full-time and earn higher salaries than their peers with high school diplomas.

Census data shows that B.C. women in their 30s working full-time earned $56,000 if they had a bachelor’s degree, $40,000 with a college degree and only $33,000 with a high school diploma. For men, the corresponding figures are $74,000 for a bachelor’s degree, $58,000 for a college diploma and $50,000 for high school.

With higher earnings come higher income taxes and less need for government cash transfers like welfare and employment insurance. A new study I’ve authored for the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives calculates the value of the extra income taxes (net of transfers) paid by female university graduates over their careers at $98,400, and $155,400 for men. This at least than twice the actual cost to the province of a four-year under-graduate degree in one of B.C.’s public universities, $50,630, and tuition fees already cover 40 per cent of that… Read More

November 24th, 2011
thebriefingroom

Fanshawe students enjoy ROI rate of 6.1%, report finds

According to a new report on the socioeconomic benefits generated by Fanshawe College, students at the institution will enjoy a 6.1% rate of return on their investments of time and money. For every dollar a student invests in Fanshawe, he or she will receive a cumulative $1.38 in higher future earnings over the next 3 decades or so. The report observes that for every credit completed, Fanshawe students will, on average, make $44 more per year every year they are in the workforce. Alternatively, for every full-time year they attend, students will make an additional $1,349 annually. In the aggregate (all existing students), the higher earnings amount to approximately $31.2 million annually for each year they remain in the workforce. Fanshawe News | Executive Summary (Academicagroup)

November 18th, 2011
thebriefingroom

Education has Biggest Impact on Earnings, 5 Times More than Other Factors

A new U.S. Census Bureau Study shows how education levels have more of an effect on earnings over a 40 year span in the workforce than any other demographic factor, giving evidence that a worker with a professional degree is expected to make more than a worker with an education level of 8th grade or lower.

The study released today showed that education was more effective than other demographic factors such as gender, race, and Hispanic origin.

The study shows that non-Hispanic white males, Asian males, and Asian females benefit more from higher levels of education over a 40 year career in a professional degree than those in other groups.

According to the release by the Census Bureau, white males with a professional degree make more than double, about $2.4 million more than that of Hispanic females with the same level of education.

Although many factors influence work life earnings such as race and Hispanic origin, gender, citizenship, English-speaking ability and geographic location, the most influential impact is education.

While the annual earnings impact of gender was $13,000, the impact of a professional degree and an 8th grade education was about $72,000 per year or about 5 times more than gender. The report was released by the Education and Synthetic Work-Life Earnings… Read More

November 18th, 2011
thebriefingroom

Report urges Ontarians to increase educational attainment

In a new report, the Toronto-based Institute for Competitiveness & Prosperity highlights the importance of education for Ontarians and Ontario’s overall economic performance, especially during the economic downturn. While Ontario leads the US in bachelor and professional degree attainment, the rate of master’s degrees per capita in the US is nearly double that of Ontario. In order to improve the competitiveness of Ontario’s workforce, the report urges the provincial government to continue to invest in PSE, improve access for low-income students, and encourage students to increase their qualifications. Institute for Competitiveness & Prosperity News Release | Read the report (Academicagroup)

November 14th, 2011
thebriefingroom
AUCC brochure spotlights universities’ cultural, economic, social contributions

In a new brochure, the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada states that as a $30-billion enterprise in direct expenditures alone, universities are significant drivers of economic prosperity in communities across the country. In 2010, universities employed 272,000 individuals directly, and thousands more worked, both on- and off-campus, to provide services to students, faculty, and institutions. The brochure says that every year, Canadian universities conduct nearly $1 billion in research for business and help build their competitive advantages, as well as about $1 billion in research for the health and social services non-profit sector. Canadian universities are a magnet for talent, AUCC notes. Nearly 550 — or 30% — of Canada Research Chairs were recruited from abroad, and close to half were Canadian expatriates who were attracted home. There are more than 100,000 international students enrolled at Canadian universities this year, compared to 25,500 in 1995. AUCC News Release | Brochure (Academicagroup)

AUCC brochure spotlights universities’ cultural, economic, social contributions

In a new brochure, the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada states that as a $30-billion enterprise in direct expenditures alone, universities are significant drivers of economic prosperity in communities across the country. In 2010, universities employed 272,000 individuals directly, and thousands more worked, both on- and off-campus, to provide services to students, faculty, and institutions. The brochure says that every year, Canadian universities conduct nearly $1 billion in research for business and help build their competitive advantages, as well as about $1 billion in research for the health and social services non-profit sector. Canadian universities are a magnet for talent, AUCC notes. Nearly 550 — or 30% — of Canada Research Chairs were recruited from abroad, and close to half were Canadian expatriates who were attracted home. There are more than 100,000 international students enrolled at Canadian universities this year, compared to 25,500 in 1995. AUCC News Release | Brochure (Academicagroup)

November 7th, 2011
thebriefingroom
Value of a degree
A degree is an opportunity, not a guarantee.

Yet another study has been released as to whether a degree is worth  the time and money. ROI, or return on investment discussions, dominated  the national coverage. Questions were raised about the income  distribution of degree holders and the fact that rates of return on  certain arts degrees were running “as low” as four to six percent. The  real headlines, though, were focused on the fact that 18 percent of  degree holders were earning less than half Canada’s median income.
The particulars are new but the discussion and inevitable concerns  are not. Every year or so another study appears that praises, questions  or doubts the worth of degrees. The core arts and science programs are  often singled out (maybe the studies are done by commerce grads) and  compared to alternate choices such as trade school or, as one  commentator said, heading off to Fort McMurray.
One part of me knows these are valid issues and that it is legitimate  for people to have some sense of the monetary worth of their degree.  Such studies may be even more pertinent for those who face considerable  debt loads on graduation. Yet, there is something both artificial and  disturbing about this attempt to draw a straight line from courses taken  to dollars earned.
We educators have always argued that university teaches certain key  skills, especially in the core programs. There is the course content,  but most graduates in arts and science (and many other degrees) will not  be taking their knowledge of biology, English literature or political  science directly into the workplace. What they do take is some  combination of critical thinking, ability to write and, perhaps most of  all, ability to learn. When someone is handed a task, the ability to  decipher how it might be managed, research the background material and  then express the results in a clear and cogent fashion is an important,  complex and durable skill. One might also add ancillary abilities  derived from university, in—cluding time management and teamwork.
We academics also like to think that there is something in what  universities offer that goes beyond the workplace yet has inherent  value. Exposure to new perspectives, the chance to meet people from  different cultures and nations, the chance to participate in new  activities, from sports to campus politics, all open doors to those who  take advantage of the opportunity… Read More

Value of a degree

A degree is an opportunity, not a guarantee.

Yet another study has been released as to whether a degree is worth the time and money. ROI, or return on investment discussions, dominated the national coverage. Questions were raised about the income distribution of degree holders and the fact that rates of return on certain arts degrees were running “as low” as four to six percent. The real headlines, though, were focused on the fact that 18 percent of degree holders were earning less than half Canada’s median income.

The particulars are new but the discussion and inevitable concerns are not. Every year or so another study appears that praises, questions or doubts the worth of degrees. The core arts and science programs are often singled out (maybe the studies are done by commerce grads) and compared to alternate choices such as trade school or, as one commentator said, heading off to Fort McMurray.

One part of me knows these are valid issues and that it is legitimate for people to have some sense of the monetary worth of their degree. Such studies may be even more pertinent for those who face considerable debt loads on graduation. Yet, there is something both artificial and disturbing about this attempt to draw a straight line from courses taken to dollars earned.

We educators have always argued that university teaches certain key skills, especially in the core programs. There is the course content, but most graduates in arts and science (and many other degrees) will not be taking their knowledge of biology, English literature or political science directly into the workplace. What they do take is some combination of critical thinking, ability to write and, perhaps most of all, ability to learn. When someone is handed a task, the ability to decipher how it might be managed, research the background material and then express the results in a clear and cogent fashion is an important, complex and durable skill. One might also add ancillary abilities derived from university, in—cluding time management and teamwork.

We academics also like to think that there is something in what universities offer that goes beyond the workplace yet has inherent value. Exposure to new perspectives, the chance to meet people from different cultures and nations, the chance to participate in new activities, from sports to campus politics, all open doors to those who take advantage of the opportunity… Read More

November 7th, 2011
thebriefingroom

Why do certain young people avoid college, university?

Post-secondary school payoff is documented but aboriginals, low-income and first generations still avoid it

As the Canadian economy sheds jobs, finding the answer to why certain segments of the population - aboriginals, first-generation and lowincome students - are so resistant to the lure of college or university has gained new urgency.

Governments have pumped money into grants and student aid. Given clear evidence of a higher education wage premium, it was expected that people from all socio-economic backgrounds would flood into institutions.

It hasn’t happened. And if we still want people to get a post-secondary education, we have to ask where we go from here if price is not an issue and the benefits of higher education are underrated.

The issue was centre stage this week at a conference on financial literacy organized by the Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.

Harvey Weingarten, the council’s president, said in an interview the motivation for the event was simple: “A post-secondary credential is the ticket to a better personal and professional life.”

A well-educated population is critical to Canada’s future as a knowledgebased economy, where, Weingarten said, diploma-and degree-holders are better placed to survive economic uncertainty than those without.

“The people who lose jobs are the people without post-secondary credentials,” he said, hours before Statistics Canada released the latest job numbers, which showed there were 54,000 fewer people working in Canada in October.

But not every segment of society is participating equitably, “so we want to get them there,” Weingarten said… Read More

November 7th, 2011
thebriefingroom

Selling higher education to those who aren’t buying it

…There’s a small but growing field of research in Canada that’s exploring the link between financial literacy — the knowledge of all the costs, benefits and available aid associated with going to college or university — and access to higher education.

At the Fear of Finance conference, a two-day gathering organized by the Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario, several hundred people working at colleges and universities, in the public and private sectors and for non-profit organizations came together to share their knowledge and experiences.

Harvey Weingarten, the council’s president, says the motivation for holding the conference is simple: “A post-secondary credential is the ticket to a better personal and professional life.”

A well-educated population is critical to Canada’s future as a knowledge-based economy, where, Weingarten says, people with diplomas and degrees are better placed to survive periods of economic uncertainty than those without.

“The people who lose jobs are the people without post-secondary credentials,” he says.

But not every segment of Canadian society is participating equitably, “so we want to get them there,” Weingarten says.

If researchers and policy-makers can figure out what the barriers are that prevent some people from accessing the financial aid and other supports available to go to college or university, then they can devise a message that will reach the intended audience and encourage them to apply, he hopes… Read More

November 7th, 2011
thebriefingroom
Will an undergrad degree really help you get a better job?

Record numbers of first-year university students flocked to campus  this fall—but that hasn’t stopped nagging questions about the value of a  bachelor’s degree. Despite persuasive statistical evidence that  graduates find careers related to their studies and earn more than  others over a lifetime, Canadian universities are under the gun to  demonstrate what it means to have a degree… Read More

Will an undergrad degree really help you get a better job?

Record numbers of first-year university students flocked to campus this fall—but that hasn’t stopped nagging questions about the value of a bachelor’s degree. Despite persuasive statistical evidence that graduates find careers related to their studies and earn more than others over a lifetime, Canadian universities are under the gun to demonstrate what it means to have a degree… Read More

November 7th, 2011
thebriefingroom

A university education is for everyone

..The idea that the answer to maintaining high standards at universities lies in getting prospective students to wonder whether they would be better off considering a training or trade program belies a faulty conception of what universities are for. Universities are not for job training or getting into a career. As such, they are not in competition with colleges or vocational institutions.

Universities are about education, about learning for the sake of learning. A student takes courses in English so that she might respond intelligently to works of literature. A student takes courses in history so that she might reflect intelligently on the past. She takes courses in philosophy so that she might confront philosophical perplexity competently. She studies biology so that she might see the living world as a biologist does. And so on through the disciplines.

As a student working toward her bachelor’s degree, she becomes competent to pursue research or study in each of the various disciplines that make up her program. But she also acquires the habits of mind and the tastes of an intellectual: the ability to see different sides to an issue and to evaluate claims dispassionately, the ability to withhold judgment, the desire to figure it out for herself, a taste for controversy. If all goes well, she also acquires a little protection from all the pressures to conform that continually assault her individuality.

There’s nothing in this about preparing for a job or a career. University done rightly is great preparation for life, of course, and, thereby, indirectly it’s preparation for success in work. The goal, though, is simply to study and learn… Read More

November 2nd, 2011
thebriefingroom
Worried? I’m Terrified

read with great interest Kevin Kiley’s October 10 Inside Higher Ed piece — “Starting  to Worry” — which uses Smith College’s very interesting and valuable  “Futures Initiative” planning process as a “take-off” to rehearse again a  narrative about what’s wrong with higher education in America. While that  article focused on elite residential liberal arts colleges, there is a push  across all sectors of higher education to consider a radical shift away from  proven modes of teaching and learning, with arguably the greatest pressure  coming on institutions without the resources of Smith and others discussed in  that piece.
I agree that these are very challenging times for American higher education.  I agree that getting our strategy right for the future is urgent. I agree that  higher education is expensive and becoming more so. I disagree vehemently,  however, with proposals for reform of American higher education that jettison  what we know works in teaching and learning for untested — or, where tested,  proven less effective — restructurings that are tantamount to betting the farm.  Here are my arguments and evidence.
1. You must begin with aims and objectives.
Missing from Smith’s Futures Initiative (though perhaps unstated because  implicit in its mission) and Kiley’s article is a statement of what the aims and  objectives of higher education should be. It is impossible to assess the  efficiency of a system, or whether it costs too much, when its goals are  unspecified. We are hearing today a literal cacophony of commentary from  business leaders, economists, journalists, and even a growing number of higher  education leaders that the education Americans need for the 21st century must  stress inquiry and analysis, critical and creative thinking, integrative and  reflective thinking, written and oral communication, quantitative literacy,  information literacy, intercultural understanding, and teamwork and real-world  problem-solving, as well as knowledge and competence in specific fields of  learning.
These are the skills and learning necessary for success in today’s  occupational system; they are even more important for the global occupational  system to which we are moving.  They are as essential for community college  students as they are for students seeking four-year degrees.  We must ensure  that community college students are not left behind in the competition for jobs  in the new economy because they do not have the higher-order skills it requires.  Proposals that focus on giving community college students only short-term job  training have the potential to do just that.
2. These learning goals are hard to accomplish. They are even more  difficult to accomplish through systems that seek efficiency through  substitution of capital for labor
Research shows that the learning outcomes essential for the 21st century are  most fully achieved by students in colleges characterized by high levels of  student engagement — when, in other words, students are challenged academically;  experience high levels of purposeful, active, and collaborative learning; enjoy  quality interactions with faculty around their academic work; experience the  enrichment of such opportunities as well-designed internships, collaborative  research with faculty members and study of other cultures (abroad or in the  U.S.); and benefit from supportive campus environments. The extent to which  campuses provide these kinds of engagement for their students is measured by the  National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)…
Read More
Worried? I’m Terrified

read with great interest Kevin Kiley’s October 10 Inside Higher Ed piece — “Starting to Worry” — which uses Smith College’s very interesting and valuable “Futures Initiative” planning process as a “take-off” to rehearse again a narrative about what’s wrong with higher education in America. While that article focused on elite residential liberal arts colleges, there is a push across all sectors of higher education to consider a radical shift away from proven modes of teaching and learning, with arguably the greatest pressure coming on institutions without the resources of Smith and others discussed in that piece.

I agree that these are very challenging times for American higher education. I agree that getting our strategy right for the future is urgent. I agree that higher education is expensive and becoming more so. I disagree vehemently, however, with proposals for reform of American higher education that jettison what we know works in teaching and learning for untested — or, where tested, proven less effective — restructurings that are tantamount to betting the farm. Here are my arguments and evidence.

1. You must begin with aims and objectives.

Missing from Smith’s Futures Initiative (though perhaps unstated because implicit in its mission) and Kiley’s article is a statement of what the aims and objectives of higher education should be. It is impossible to assess the efficiency of a system, or whether it costs too much, when its goals are unspecified. We are hearing today a literal cacophony of commentary from business leaders, economists, journalists, and even a growing number of higher education leaders that the education Americans need for the 21st century must stress inquiry and analysis, critical and creative thinking, integrative and reflective thinking, written and oral communication, quantitative literacy, information literacy, intercultural understanding, and teamwork and real-world problem-solving, as well as knowledge and competence in specific fields of learning.

These are the skills and learning necessary for success in today’s occupational system; they are even more important for the global occupational system to which we are moving.  They are as essential for community college students as they are for students seeking four-year degrees.  We must ensure that community college students are not left behind in the competition for jobs in the new economy because they do not have the higher-order skills it requires. Proposals that focus on giving community college students only short-term job training have the potential to do just that.

2. These learning goals are hard to accomplish. They are even more difficult to accomplish through systems that seek efficiency through substitution of capital for labor

Research shows that the learning outcomes essential for the 21st century are most fully achieved by students in colleges characterized by high levels of student engagement — when, in other words, students are challenged academically; experience high levels of purposeful, active, and collaborative learning; enjoy quality interactions with faculty around their academic work; experience the enrichment of such opportunities as well-designed internships, collaborative research with faculty members and study of other cultures (abroad or in the U.S.); and benefit from supportive campus environments. The extent to which campuses provide these kinds of engagement for their students is measured by the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)…

Read More

October 7th, 2011
thebriefingroom

The Real Value of a Degree or Diploma

Original Air Date: Wednesday, October 05, 2011

In today’s competitive labour market, advocates of post-secondary education say students need at least one degree or diploma just to be considered for a job - regardless of specialty.

But with the cost of a four-year degree now averaging $80,000, critics argue some degrees and diplomas are nearly useless and post-secondary institutions need to be more honest about which courses will really help students get ahead.

What is the real value of a degree or diploma in Alberta now? Has post-secondary education become an industry? If so, whose interests is it serving most - schools or students?
 
Joining us for this discussion is William Van’t Veld from ATB Financial; Mike Mahon, President of University of Lethbridge; and Kyle Moline from the Council of Alberta University Students… Click here to watch video

Likes

keeping the students' association of mount royal university current on trends and issues important to our post secondary scene

Visit the SAMRU's YouTube Channel!

Visit SAMRU's website

Following